Friday, April 25, 2014

3 Important Notes Indonesian Civil Society in NETmundial

A number of Civil Society Organization ( CSO ) Indonesia has been actively involved in the global multi-stakeholder meeting of the Internet , NETmundial ( NETmundial.br ) , who has just finished held in Sao Paulo - Brazil , 23 to 24 April 2014.

There are three important notes of Indonesian CSOs related to Internet governance process verbally conveyed directly through the hub ( teleconference ) special NETmundial Indonesia , on 24 April 2014 , evening ( Central European Time ) .
( Read: cara membuat blog di wordpress )

" Multistakeholder approach ( multi-stakeholder : government , business , civil society , the technical community , academia - Ed. ) In Internet governance , should be made ​​more concrete , no longer limited to the spirit . This approach should be encouraged to be part of the decision-making process at the national level , "said Donny BU , from ICT Watch , which delivered the first record on behalf of Indonesian CSOs Network for Internet Governance ( ID - CONFIG ) .

According to Donny , the governance processes running now , the spirit of multi-stakeholder it has opened up opportunities for a variety of symmetric parties to engage in dialogue internet governance . " But on the field , there is asymmetric capabilities and competence of the parties involved , " he added , in a written statement received detikINET , Friday ( 25/04/2014 ) .

As for the second record , which was delivered by Shita Laksmi of Southeast Asia Technology and Transparency Initiatives ( SEATTI ) / HIVOS is also the name of ID - CONFIG , emphasizing the importance of the principle of transparency and accountability in policy making processes ( governance ) Internet at the national level . " Transparency and accountability should be monitored and assessed continuously by a multi - stakeholder , " Shita said .

According Shita , just resting on the implementation of the multi-stakeholder dialogue , not necessarily a guarantee that the process of decision-making is transparent and accountable .

" There are a number of experiences where the discussion ( though already multistakeholder - ed . ) , But the poor quality of the group's report , ( because ) some suggestions of the parties are not taken seriously , " he said .

source:detik.com

No comments:

Post a Comment